In China, some brick and tile plants use a counter-current tunnel dryer powered by waste heat from Hoffmann kilns to dry green bricks, enabling year-round production.
![]()
The tunnel drying chamber consists of 15 sections and uses one W9-57-101N16B centrifugal fan for centralized heat supply and another fan of the same model for centralized moisture exhaust. This air supply and exhaust arrangement has the following drawbacks:
![]()
To address this issue, the factory drew on experience with axial-flow fans for sectional moisture exhaust. The motor was positioned outside the fan to prevent damage. Accordingly, a 45° cast-iron casing and cast-aluminum blades were designed, with the motor mounted externally on the moisture exhaust fan.
![]()
After adopting this fan, drying conditions in each tunnel section became uniform, significantly improving drying uniformity and efficiency, reducing power consumption and scrap losses, and eliminating production stoppages for fan maintenance. As shown in Table 6-2, sectional moisture exhaust using this fan offers clear advantages over centralized moisture exhaust.
Table 6-2
| Comparison Item | Unit | Centralized Exhaust | Sectional Exhaust | Comparison between the Two |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Air Volume | m³/h | 85,000~92,000 | 106,300~112,200 | Increase 18~25% |
| Total Motor Power | kW | 55 | 45 | Reduction 18% |
| Brick Entry Time | min | 22 | 22 | Equal |
| Output | pcs/double shift | 178,200 | 178,200 | Equal |
| Drying Degree | % | Average 60 | Average 85 | Increase 25% |
| Scrap Loss | % | Average 10 | Average 3 | Reduction 7% |
![]()
In summary, the results of sectional moisture exhaust are highly significant. However, the first-generation moisture exhaust fan still had the following shortcomings:
In response to the above issues, a horizontal 90° moisture exhaust fan was subsequently designed (Figure 6-10). After commissioning and trial operation, the results were excellent.
![]()
Figure 6-10 Schematic Diagram of Moisture Exhaust Fan